Mmm-mm Anonymity
Some people are just delightful. Especially those who choose to be controversial for the sake of being controversial. For example, this guy is all about PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY(if only you could hear the booming conservative echo chamber around that word) and some other barely intelligible nonsense. He seems like he'd be nice to have at a party, but he'd have to be wearing a big red nose and big shoes.
Here's an example of non-controversial controversy:
All of a sudden, after we use to consider America to be a rational and balanced country... All of a sudden, it violates international conventions, cancels treaties, ignores the U.N., acts on its own accord, attacks nations, kills innocent people, and claims it has the right to do so - and all this is based on lies. These were lies from beginning to end, and we were not used to lying - not in policy, not in our discourse, and not in the media.
Hmmm . . . controversial. Well, actually, I'm going to have to say no. I think what he's actually hit on is an example of his own ignorance of what happened prior to the Bush presidency. That is, if he actually looks at the historical record, the real left was saying that Bill Clinton did pretty much the same crap that Bush has done, but generally was able to do so without looking so damn smug.
I promise you, if you take out your old copies of Zmag you'll find that they were pretty merciless on Clinton too. Of course, it's the conservative perception that everyone on the left thought that Clinton was hunky dory. That's because conservatives were too busy looking at semen stained dresses and eating their hearts out at Clinton's popularity during the '90s. It's amazing what a little politics will do to one's perception of history.
Again, the MSM (mainstream media, for those lefties who aren't accustomed to the retard conservative nomenclature) underserves vritually every group when reporting, not just you.
