
I've noticed a lot of hullabaloo on other blogs about how president Bush didn't lie, and how congress had access to the same information that the president did, and how with that information they all unequivocally voted for war with Saddam Huss . . . er, Iraq.
I'd like to take this time to say that it's possible that Bush didn't lie. I'll concede that. But then those who are convinced that he didn't lie face the alternative that he's just a plain bad leader with bad judgement.
"Why does he have to be a bad leader? Certainly better than a lilly-livered Democrat, right?" You ask. Well, because a good leader would have paid attention to the dissenting voices in his own country,
his own party, and the world.
Bush was right, sometimes the unpopular thing to do is the right thing: and nothing could be more true when it comes to your own party, loaded with Neo-cons trying to egg you into a war that
on balance serves no purpose.
The key thing in that phrase was "on balance." What that means is that the amount you lose is as much or greater than what you gain. So let's do a little of the devil's math, shall we?
1. Liberated Iraq from a Dictator -
Very Good2. Attempting to set up a democracy -
Good 3. Ended the administration of a corrupt Oil-for-Food program -
Good4. Asserted our power in the middle east -
Jury is still out5. Opened up a huge window for religious infighting -
Not good6. Accidentally facilitated the creation of "Al Qaeda in Iraq" -
Bad7. In the process of liberating Iraq, killed as many civillians as their Dictator had -
Accidental, But Still Bad8. Perpetuated an image of the US that we're always getting into wars without end -
Accidental, But Very Bad9. Alienated our closest allies and replaced them with less strategic or financially secure allies -
Bad10. Diverted valuable resources away from fighting "the real" war on terror and instead created another front for the war on terror that didn't previously exist -
Very BadI could go on. So when I say Bush is a liar, it's actually kind of a compliment because the alternative is to say that he's just a fucking idiot without a game plan.
Of course, this ignores the fact that the whole run-up to the war was a political sham that attempted to silence or smear credible critics of the "plan." So, in the sense that Bush & Co. made obvious and deliberate attempts to forcefully shut people up, I also think it's fair to conclude that he lied.
So in the end, I'd have to say that Bush is a lying idiot. K?